icon caret-left icon caret-right instagram pinterest linkedin facebook twitter goodreads question-circle facebook circle twitter circle linkedin circle instagram circle goodreads circle pinterest circle

Blog

Death in Gold Rush San Francisco

You think it's tough finding housing in San Francisco now, the Gold Rush was astounding; 1,000 SF residents in 1849 and just three years later, 36,000! Here are other jaw-dropping facts from recent reading:

 

"One doctor estimated that between 1851 and 1853, 20% of the people who came to California seeking gold died within six months of their arrival."[i]

 

And it was a deadly journey as well: "a government report estimated that each mile of the 2,000-mile journey [west] cost 17 lives – a total of 34,000 lives. Any such figure is at best a good guess; but nevertheless, the number of deaths is staggering." [ii]

 

"San Francisco became a United States territory in 1846 [and] had a population, not counting Indians, of less than 8,000 in 1846. Then came the gold rush, and 115,000 persons, mostly male, were added to California's population."[iii]

 

"This rapid growth led many people to live in cramped, unsanitary conditions, whether in tents or other dwellings, and San Francisco didn't have any real hospitals or a formalized system of health care. Several deadly diseases, including cholera, malaria, yellow fever, typhoid, smallpox and scurvy, rampaged through [San Francisco's] the city's population."[iv]

 

By 1900, the city's population was 342,782."

 

 

 Read More 

Be the first to comment

Interview with the Author on "Dancing Through a Deluge"

 

This is the third book you've written that is set in the Middle Ages. What do you find so interesting about that era?

The Medieval Period was a watershed time. The Age of Discovery was opening the Americas, trade was more global than ever before, the monarchy was giving way to mercantilism which grew into the middle class.

I personally don't care about the lives of royalty: their stories are overtold. Tradespeople and craft workers make interesting characters because we recognize the products they make, but the processes are very surprising and so, I hope, interesting to readers. The characters are enough like us for readers to identify with them but enough unlike us to surprise the reader as well.

 

There are also advantages as an author to writing about the Middle Ages: communication was very slow which makes it easier to work with characters who don't have access to information or each other at the speed with which we communicate. It took a long time to travel during that period; there was almost no postal system. It's a time that is less primitive than the early post-Roman era but less well trodden than the Elizabethan era.

 

What are some of the disadvantages of writing historical fiction?

Historical fiction based in the Middle Ages is going to be inaccurate on a number of levels. While women certainly had power and agency, the majority of them did not and it gets very boring writing about powerless women for the sake of accuracy. Having more than one comment from a man about the oddity of a powerful woman is just jarring to the story. The Medieval Period was also a violent time which is unpleasant to read about, as well as a time when people were very religious which I have no interest in. That means that you are writing about independent, non-religious women who are able to escape much of the endemic violence. You strive for accuracy in so many aspects of the work, but that core conceit is necessary.

  Read More 

Be the first to comment